<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Flock is up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mkeefedesign.com/blog/2008/01/16/what-the-flock-is-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mkeefedesign.com/blog/2008/01/16/what-the-flock-is-up/</link>
	<description>A look into the mind of Developer and Designer Matthew Keefe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prescott Perez-Fox</title>
		<link>http://mkeefedesign.com/blog/2008/01/16/what-the-flock-is-up/#comment-17669</link>
		<dc:creator>Prescott Perez-Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mkeefedesign.com/blog/2008/01/16/what-the-flock-is-up/#comment-17669</guid>
		<description>I prefer Safari in spite of the relative lack of plugins compared to Firefox. I prefer the interface and the bookmarks system. Also, the syncability with .mac makes it easier for me. But yes, it's annoying that sites still don't work with Safari — what's the point of being a standards-compliant browser if developers still ignore it entirely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer Safari in spite of the relative lack of plugins compared to Firefox. I prefer the interface and the bookmarks system. Also, the syncability with .mac makes it easier for me. But yes, it&#8217;s annoying that sites still don&#8217;t work with Safari — what&#8217;s the point of being a standards-compliant browser if developers still ignore it entirely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
